Good morning. I have doubts about the diagnosis by the doctors from the clinic in the case of my son, so please help. Boy 7 years old. There were enlarged relatively large lymphatic (cervical, nuchal occipital) there were no other symptoms, painless. The doctor stated that the liver and spleen were normal, she prescribed an antibiotic for a week. In the course of its use, the swells have slightly (rather not from it) decreased. After the end of the treatment, a rash appeared, first tiny lumps in warm places, armpits, groin, rise. We visited the doctor, she said that it was urticaria that prescribed hitaxe. The next day, the rash increased in size on the whole body, in the most occupied places it merged into spots. On the back and abdomen dots. The doctor, after seeing and consulting with the other, found that it was infectious erythema. They said the rash could last 2 weeks. On the 3rd day, the rash has significantly reduced, today is the 4th day and there is no trace of the rash, and the ejections have almost disappeared on their own. The son felt very well throughout the whole period, he did not have a fever, there was no change in well-being. The doctors still insist that it is a blush, but in my opinion the symptoms do not indicate it. There was no characteristic rash on the face, only small lumps. The rash lasted 4 days so for a short time. It also appeared on the dloniach and feet, which apparently does not occur in erythema. In addition, a week before the enlarged vezly which is the first symptom of rubella. Please give me a hint if I can be right. Doctors believe that when the son was vaccinated, the spread does not apply to him. Nodes do not connect to the rash. I attach photos from the left day 1 day 2 and day 3.